Jax: I have some issues. Why should someone political believe that this has any relation to a proper program? At the least it needs examples of how this animates decision making -- always already, and changes introduced by this newfound sensitivity.

Night Crow: And mightn't a traditionalist religious person be hopelessly offended? Is that necessary?

Nelt: Isn't a bit old hat, that about agility in the face of crisis? 100 flowers so that changing conditions can allow pre-developed diversity? Should we include more evolutionary insights to make it more interesting -- Quantum Darwinism as the background for punctuated equilibrium, to be mined for political practice?

Jax: I think the question any revolutionary will be faced: is this or is it not the end of politics as such? We're a bit coy on that point, no?

j(A)de: As usual, isn't all about definitions? Isn't the point to repaint the picture of what we've always already been doing, so that even though our ideas about our ideas are all different, the politic remains?